My point is that this article in no way improves the quality of live of black and brown Americans. If the author is interested in doing that, that will clearly be written in the article. You state that she’s giving potential bigots a goal — are bigots going to read this and suddenly have a change of heart and mind? What bigot is even going to read this article? We need to look at the results -or potential results- of the article. An article or act is only anti-racist if it may actually have some effect that ensures the safety, well-being, and thriving of black and brown folks. This article does not.